RM100K Fine for Vehicle Parts Trademark Breach

August 19, 2026 0 comments

Daily Article Image

Well Perfect Auto Parts Fined RM100,000 for Trademark Infringement in Malaysia

Well Perfect Auto Parts Sdn Bhd, a Malaysian vehicle spare parts supplier, was fined RM100,000 by the Selayang Sessions Court on Tuesday for five charges of using registered trademarks without approval on 3,075 units of lubricant and 4,398 units of oil filters. The company, represented by directors Khoo Zhi Sheng, 42, and Yap Kok Lim, 43, pleaded guilty to all charges under Section 100 of the Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 518). The offence occurred at the company's premises in Taman Perindustrian Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, at 2.30 am on 30 April 2025.

This case highlights the legal consequences of trademark misuse in Malaysia's automotive parts industry, where counterfeit products can undermine consumer trust and violate intellectual property laws. For Malaysian vehicle owners and industry stakeholders, this ruling reinforces the importance of sourcing genuine, trademark-compliant parts.

Key Facts

AttributeValue
Company FinedWell Perfect Auto Parts Sdn Bhd
Fine AmountRM100,000
CourtSelayang Sessions Court
JudgeNorazlin Othman
DirectorsKhoo Zhi Sheng (42), Yap Kok Lim (43)
Number of Charges5
Lubricant Units Seized3,075 units (two well-known car brands)
Oil Filter Units Seized4,398 units (three local and luxury car brands)
Date of Offence30 April 2025, 2.30 am
LocationTaman Perindustrian Kepong, Kuala Lumpur
Legal ProvisionSection 100, Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 518)
Charge SectionSection 102(1)(c), punishable under Section 102(1)(c)(i)
Maximum Fine per ItemRM15,000 (first offence); RM30,000 (subsequent offences)
ProsecutionKPDN Deputy Public Prosecutor Hazmida Harris Lee and KPDN Prosecuting Officer Azmil Aspara
Defence CounselWayne Ng Wei Wei

What Was the Fine and How Was It Calculated?

The RM100,000 fine was imposed for five charges involving the misuse of registered trademarks on vehicle lubricants and oil filters. Under Section 102(1)(c)(i) of the Trademarks Act 2019, the maximum fine is RM15,000 per item for a first offence, and RM30,000 per item for subsequent offences. The court considered the total number of infringing units—3,075 lubricants and 4,398 oil filters—when determining the penalty.

"The company was charged with having 3,075 units of lubricant from two well-known car brands and 4,398 units of oil filters from three local and luxury car brands that used registered trademarks incorrectly under Section 100 of the Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 518)."

— Source: Careta, based on Bernama reporting

The RM100,000 fine reflects the scale of the infringement, involving 7,473 total units of counterfeit-branded automotive products.

What Legal Framework Governs Trademark Infringement in Malaysia?

Trademark infringement in Malaysia is governed by the Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 518), which came into force to replace the older Trade Marks Act 1976. Section 100 defines what constitutes improper use of a registered trademark, while Section 102 outlines the penalties for such offences. The Act applies to all businesses operating in Malaysia, including automotive parts suppliers, and is enforced by the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN).

For Malaysian businesses, this case serves as a warning that trademark violations carry significant financial penalties. The maximum fine of RM15,000 per item for first offences can quickly escalate to substantial amounts when large quantities of goods are involved. Repeat offenders face double the penalty, up to RM30,000 per item.

Under Malaysian law, using a registered trademark without approval on automotive parts can result in fines of up to RM15,000 per item for first offences and RM30,000 per item for subsequent violations.

Who Was Involved in This Trademark Case?

The case involved Well Perfect Auto Parts Sdn Bhd, a vehicle spare parts supplier based in Taman Perindustrian Kepong, Kuala Lumpur. The company was represented in court by its directors, Khoo Zhi Sheng (42) and Yap Kok Lim (43), who were also named as persons charged (OKS). The prosecution was led by Hazmida Harris Lee, Deputy Public Prosecutor from KPDN, and Azmil Aspara, KPDN Prosecuting Officer. The company was represented by defence counsel Wayne Ng Wei Wei.

The court proceedings took place at the Selayang Sessions Court before Judge Norazlin Othman. The company pleaded guilty to all five charges, which likely contributed to the sentencing outcome. The case was reported by Bernama, Malaysia's national news agency, and published by Careta on 18 August 2026.

The Selayang Sessions Court, presided over by Judge Norazlin Othman, handled the case with prosecution from KPDN and defence representation from lawyer Wayne Ng Wei Wei.

What Products Were Involved in the Trademark Breach?

The infringing products included 3,075 units of lubricant bearing trademarks of two well-known car brands, and 4,398 units of oil filters bearing trademarks of three local and luxury car brands. These products are essential components for vehicle maintenance, and their sale with unauthorised trademarks misleads consumers about their origin and quality.

In Malaysia's tropical climate, where vehicles are subject to high temperatures and humidity, the quality of lubricants and oil filters is critical for engine performance and longevity. Counterfeit products may not meet the required specifications, potentially leading to engine damage and safety risks for Malaysian drivers.

The seizure of 7,473 units of counterfeit-branded lubricants and oil filters underscores the scale of trademark infringement in Malaysia's automotive aftermarket sector.

Who Is This Ruling Relevant For in Malaysia?

This ruling is directly relevant to automotive parts suppliers, distributors, and retailers operating in Malaysia, particularly those in industrial areas like Taman Perindustrian Kepong. It also serves as a reference point for vehicle owners who purchase lubricants and oil filters, as it highlights the prevalence of counterfeit products in the market and the legal protections in place.

For Malaysian consumers, this case reinforces the importance of purchasing automotive parts from authorised dealers and checking for genuine trademarks. The KPDN's enforcement actions demonstrate that the government is actively monitoring and prosecuting trademark violations to protect both businesses and consumers.

Malaysian automotive parts suppliers must ensure all products bearing registered trademarks have proper authorisation, as KPDN actively prosecutes violations under the Trademarks Act 2019.

Common Questions

What is the maximum fine for trademark infringement in Malaysia?

Under Section 102(1)(c)(i) of the Trademarks Act 2019, the maximum fine is RM15,000 per item for a first offence and RM30,000 per item for subsequent offences. In this case, the total fine was RM100,000 for five charges involving 7,473 units.

Which court handled the Well Perfect Auto Parts trademark case?

The case was heard at the Selayang Sessions Court in Selangor, before Judge Norazlin Othman. The company pleaded guilty to all five charges, and the court imposed a total fine of RM100,000.

What products did Well Perfect Auto Parts sell with unauthorised trademarks?

The company had 3,075 units of lubricant from two well-known car brands and 4,398 units of oil filters from three local and luxury car brands. All products used registered trademarks without approval, violating Section 100 of the Trademarks Act 2019.

Sources and Methodology

This article is based on a single primary source: the Careta article titled "Syarikat alat ganti kenderaan didenda RM100,000 guna cap dagangan tanpa kelulusan," published on 18 August 2026, which cites Bernama as the original news agency. The source URL is https://careta.my/article/syarikat-alat-ganti-kenderaan-didenda-rm100000-guna-cap-dagangan-tanpa-kelulusan.

All facts, figures, and quotes have been translated from Malay to English (British spelling) while preserving original entity names and proper nouns. No currency conversion was required as the source material already references RM (Ringgit Malaysia). The legal provisions cited are from the Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 518), Malaysia's current trademark legislation.

This article was last updated on 18 August 2026. Information specific to Malaysia was verified against the source material from Careta and Bernama.

Link copied to clipboard!